The Financial Ombudsman is being reviewed: Here’s what it means for your complaint

If something goes wrong with your bank, insurer or lender, there’s a familiar path you’re expected to follow. You raise a complaint, you go back and forth, you get a final response, not always the one you were hoping for, and then you’re told you can take it further. That’s when the Financial Ombudsman Service comes in. This is the point where your complaint leaves the company and is looked at independently, with a decision based on what’s seen as a fair resolution.

But that system is now under review, and the changes being discussed could affect how your complaint is handled in the future and how likely you are to succeed.

What’s actually changing?

The government wants to make the Ombudsman more predictable and consistent, but the way it plans to do that is where things start to matter for you. One of the biggest proposed changes is limiting how far the Ombudsman can go beyond the rules. Right now, it can look at what’s “fair and reasonable”, even if a company has technically followed regulations.

Under the new approach, that flexibility could be reduced, meaning if a company has followed the rules, it may be harder to challenge them successfully. There are also plans to introduce a 10 year time limit on complaints. That means if an issue comes to light years later, as often happens with mis-selling cases, you may no longer be able to take it to the Ombudsman at all.

At the same time, the system is being tightened in other ways. The Ombudsman may be required to work more closely with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) on unclear cases, and there’s a broader push to filter out weaker complaints earlier and reduce the number that reach a full investigation.

Taken together, these changes are designed to make outcomes more consistent, but they also make the process more structured and less flexible.

Why this matters for your complaint

This isn’t just about what happens at the Ombudsman stage, it can change how companies behave much earlier in the complaints process. At the moment, many complaints are resolved before they ever reach the Ombudsman. Companies know there’s a real risk that an independent decision could go against them, so they’re often more willing to compromise or settle and that pressure can often work in your favour.

The review is aiming to make the Ombudsman more “predictable” and consistent. On the surface, that sounds sensible. But in practice, it could mean a shift away from flexible, case-by-case decisions towards something more rigid and criteria-based.

Right now, the Ombudsman looks beyond just what’s written in terms and conditions. It considers what actually happened, how you were treated, and whether the outcome is fair. That flexibility is often what helps people win complaints that don’t fit neatly into a set of rules.

If that flexibility is reduced, you may start to notice a difference. Complaints that would previously have been upheld on fairness grounds could become harder to win if they don’t clearly meet a stricter criteria.

If decisions become more predictable and potentially more limited, then the pressure on companies to settle early may weaken. You may find they push back more, reject complaints more confidently and offer less in refunds or goodwill gestures meaning that you may have to work harder to get the same result.

Complaints could become more “black and white”

One of the biggest shifts here is subtle but important. The system is moving away from judgement and towards rules.

That might make outcomes more consistent on paper, but real life complaints aren’t always clear cut. A situation can be unfair even if it technically follows a process and historically, that’s where the Ombudsman has stepped in. If that “room for judgement” diminishes, then complaints may become more definite and either you meet the criteria or you don’t.

What you should do differently

If that happens, then the way you complain becomes more important. You can’t rely on escalation to fix things later, so you need to make your case clearly from the start.

That means taking a bit more care with how you set things out. Explaining exactly what went wrong, when it happened, and why it’s unfair. Keeping a record of all communications, emails, statements or screenshots that support your perspective. Making it easy for someone else to follow your case. It also means not accepting a rejection too quickly.

Many valid complaints are rejected the first time. That hasn’t changed. What matters is whether you challenge it properly, ask the right questions and take it further if needed.

What this means for older complaints

The proposed 10 year time limit is one of the biggest potential changes to be aware of. A lot of complaints only come to light years after the original issue. Under the new rules, those kinds of historic claims could become much harder to pursue through the Ombudsman. So if you think something might be wrong with a financial product you’ve had in the past, it’s important not to leave it too late.

Where Resolver can help

If complaints are becoming more rigid and companies are pushing back more, having a clear, structured approach matters more than ever.

Resolver can help you to set out your complaint properly from the start, guiding you through what to say and making sure you include the key details that strengthen your case. The platform keeps a record of everything you send and receive, so you always have the evidence to hand if you need to escalate. If the company doesn’t resolve your issue, Resolver helps you move your complaint forward through the correct channels.

Your right to complain isn’t disappearing and the Ombudsman will still be there, but the system around it is shifting. If these changes go ahead, complaints may become more criteria driven, companies may push back more and older complaints could face tighter limits.

That doesn’t mean you can’t win, but it does mean how you complain and how early you take action becomes more important. In a system that’s becoming more structured, the strongest complaints are the ones that are clear, well evidenced and properly documented from the start.

If you have any thoughts on this topic, or any other consumer issues you would like us to cover, feel free to get in touch with us at support@resolver.co.uk

Stay informed with the Resolver newsletter

We send out regular updates with helpful guides and news about changes that could affect you.

You’ll hear about: